I break it down to individual parts, put A, B, C on the same timeline and study how they perform. Meaning, I don't clutter the timeline with all the drums. Its much easier to adjust volumes and focus one thing at a time. Do it to all three and I would study how it stayed in phase and also how the converters dealt with it all.Įxample: I stick each example (snare, kick, tom's etc.) one after the other, on the same channel in my DAW and (compare them on the same timeline). I would much prefer one crash hit 10 sec or less with the tail as long as you could get it. This was my first thoughts as well but B also seemed to be more forward and tighter. I'll listen to them in the studio tomorrow ) Pcrecord, post: 441138, member: 46460 wrote: With my earbuds on my laptop, I like the A and C better. what you would do if you used the same everything but change the interface and tried to play the same thing twice.
The one I have is giving run time errors.
I'm waiting for a Texas Instruments fire wire pci card for the profire. Any suggestions on preferred tracks? right now I'm running 3 overheads and 2 kicks. I'll have to reduce the channel inputs to 8 for it to be fair. I'm going to do some at 96 k between the Profire 2626 and the Zen when I get a chance. I also did one at 96 k but that would give it away. Kicks and bottom snare have to be flipped. You'll have to check the polarity and phase stuff on your own.
ANTELOPE AUDIO ZEN STUDIO USED DOWNLOAD
rather than me coming up with a mix of either it's better to download and make your own mix. I also did some playing using the different convertors. After getting some sleep I did notice a difference between the Rme/Behringer and Zen D/A wise.
0 kommentar(er)
